Recent Posts

Friday, June 23, 2017

Pledis reiterates that Kang Dongho is innocent



Article: [Official Statement] NU'EST Kang Dongho reps, "The sexual harassment rumors are unfounded, we are taking legal action"

Source: Ilgan Sports via Naver

1. [+3,388, -90] ...? Just have the two get investigated by the police, that's the most objective way

2. [+2,046, -61] Well the lawsuit has been filed so I'm sure we'll hear about the results if we wait~

3. [+2,083, -105] But what are the facts though?

4. [+1,827, -59] Get investigated if you're so confident

5. [+946, -113] Hul... hahahahaha....

6. [+815, -77] I guess that means it really was Kang Dongho in the phone call then

7. [+572, -52] ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ The clarification leaves much to be desired... and the person claiming to be the victim has ben posting on Pann all night long.. ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ
- [+226, -10] I'm wondering why she's on Pann like that ㅜ it's frustrating
- [+305, -19] I'm suspicious of the victim because her story on Pann keeps changing
- [+251, -5] Her story on Pann keeps changing and her mother also wrote that she reprimanded Kang Dongho through a call 8 years ago but then made another post saying she didn't find out about what happened until recently
- [+234, -5] Yeah, her story keeps changing... I believed her at first but it's getting weird now
- [+162, -4] I'm going to get goosebumps if this ends up being fake... she had so much detail written about the inside of the car they were in... she's delusional if this all ends up being fake.
- [+187, -8] Her story has been changing a ton. It's reached a point where we aren't even sure she's the victim anymore.
- [+145, -3] In her post written in May, she wrote that she was a second year in jr high seven years ago... then in her recent post, she wrote that she was a first year in jr high eight years ago... so what's going on? How can she call herself the victim and not remember when it happened?
- [+179, -1] Yeah, that woman is going crazy changing her story on Pann right now

8. [+525, -49] So Kang Dongho's reps are of the stance that nothing happened between them at all?

-

Source: Nate

1. [+308, -46] I was thinking something was weird because the victim kept changing her story...

2. [+284, -59] Pledis's stance: Kang Dongho is innocent and the court will make the final judgment. However, the woman does not have any proof of the sexual harassment and has no consistent story about what happened eight years ago.

3. [+282, -13] I guess we'll have to wait and see

4. [+77, -4] After reading the agency's explanation, I can understand why Kang Dongho responded the way he did in that phone call. The woman brought up the sexual harassment talk through Katalk first so Kang Dongho tried to call her but she didn't pick up. Then he called his agency right away and asked what to do. The agency told him not to respond to anything she does. Then the woman called again through a different number. When he realized it was her using a different number, he got extra careful and tried to avoid her. It's understandable that he reacted the way he did since he expected a different number and was told by his agency not to do anything.

5. [+64, -11] Everyone's hung up on Kang Dongho telling her that he'll call her back but isn't that an appropriate response for a celebrity taking a call?

6. [+56, -5] The victim's story isn't matching up right now... and logically speaking, it makes no sense that they would be in a packed car together with her older brother sitting right next to her. Kang Dongho really put his hand inside her underwear in broad daylight??? I hated on Kang Dongho at first but there are a couple of suspicious points to her story

7. [+53, -8] Her story's weird. In her first post, she said her older brother was in the seat right next to her. This time, she left that out. She also said they graduated jr high together but now they didn't...?

8. [+45, -6] At first the girl gave such a detailed account that I couldn't help but believe her but the more she talks, the more her story keeps changing...

-

0 comments:

Post a Comment