How reliable are blind items?

Article: 'Blind item' rumors without any sources, up to what can you believe?

Source: OSEN via Naver

1. [+129, -3] The journalists make it worse by turning those rumors into articles without any confirmed information

2. [+120, -3] Wow, look at a media outlet that runs nothing but unconfirmed rumors talk as if they're better than unconfirmed rumors ㅋㅋㅋ

3. [+105, -15] I'd say about 8~9 out of 10 are true. There are 1 or 2 that are fake, but the amount of times they come out to be real are higher than you think.

4. [+86, -3] People believe them because most of them actually are revealed to be true later. Except for the ridiculous ones.

5. [+79, -7] The one that was circulating about Park Shi Hoo being bit by a kkot-baem turned out to be true. She did end up being a kkot-baem.

6. [+79, -9] The blind items are usually right. Not the ones started by nobodies on the internet but the ones spread by real insiders.

7. [+63, -3] Most of the ones I've read have come true... although on the internet, it seems there's a good mix of true and false ones lately.

8. [+55, -4] So far, the accuracy rate has been pretty high...

9. [+49, -2] I used to always read them thinking 'No way!!'... but then some of them end up true so I don't ignore them completely...

10. [+37, -0] I have a harder time believing the sh*t you put out as articles, all you media outlets

-