Netizens debate Arin's lingerie advertisement "why isn't she wearing it?"

Article: Oh My Girl Arin's BYC CF under controversy

Source: Idol Issue via Instagram

Netizen arguments featured in the article: "Arin must be protected", "I like that it's different from other lingerie pictorials" VS "How does it make sense that a lingerie model isn't wearing any of the lingerie?", "Why would you do a lingerie CF by holding all the lingerie up?", "Why not just hire a model who is willing to wear the lingerie? Why would you agree to do an ad when you're not comfortable wearing what you're advertising? When have you ever seen a clothing CF where the model isn't wearing it but holding it up?", "Yes, well.. I guess she doesn't have to physically wear it.. since she's still advertising it, but.. f*ck"

-

1. [+2,080] Oh, shut up. Dok2 did a contact lens CF wearing sunglasses.

2. [+1,246] Shut up. They're only mad because they don't get to see her in lingerie.

3. [+979] Well there's no law saying you have to wear what you're advertising, is there??

4. [+463] There are tons of ads like shampoo CFs where the models aren't physically using the product ㅋㅋㅋ they just have the water running

5. [+390] Why are people being like this...

6. [+536] How is this controversial ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

7. [+297] What about Cha Eunwoo, who advertised period pads when he's never had a period in his life~

8. [+213] I think the ad's cute. I see no reason that she has to physically be wearing the stuff. Just don't look or buy if it bothers you that much.

9. [+924] It seems obvious from their comments that it's the male community boards complaining about this

10. [+404] What's their excuse for Park Seo Joon and Cha Eunwoo advertising period pads?

11. [+112] They should shut up, it's not like they're even going to be buying it

12. [+387] I actually like this because it puts the focus on the lingerie. It's not like these men are ever going to buy it for themselves so why do they care?

-