Recent Posts

Saturday, January 5, 2013

Dakota Fanning contacted GD?


Article: [Exclusive] Dakota Fanning sends a love call to GD... "I want to meet him"

Source:
Dispatch via Nate

1. [+595, -146] Looks like GD is quite amazing

2. [+504, -96] Jealous of GD.... ㅠㅠ

3. [+490, -138] Playing on the world class level...

-

Article: YG "Dakota Fanning did indeed contact us... but we will meet next time due to schedules"

Source: OSEN via Nate

1. [+221, -21] Dispatch was too caught up in landing an exclusive that they just released it without confirming any of the content

2. [+208, -11] Logically, how would Fanning even know GD's phone number to contact him?

3. [+222, -36] I knew she couldn't have contacted him herself... Why did the other article write it as if she called him up?? -_- Either way, GD's jjang~!!

-

Article: Dakota Fanning and G-Dragon "Unfounded vs Wanted to meet" divided statements, what's the truth?

Source: Newsen via Nate

1. [+133, -25] I think what happened was that Fanning's agency contacted YG but Dispatch exaggerated it by saying Dakota Fanning called GD

2. [+95, -20] Looks like Dispatch went a bit overboard ㅋㅋ They said it as if Dakota called GD herself when the exchange was just between their agencies. There's no need to hate on GD or Dakota, it's just an error on Dispatch's part.

3. [+69, -19] Dispatch was the one that made the mistake so why are people calling media play on this ㅋㅋㅋ

-


127 comments:

  1. Dispatch... just stick to revealing dating scandals.


    I'm waiting for this week's couple to be revealed. Don't disappoint me!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'd like to see that conversation...where neither side can understand a thing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Am I the only one who read the headline as "Dakota Fanning contracted VD?"

    ReplyDelete
  4. I heard Dakotas agency said they never contacted YG at all. Everything YG said was a "lie"

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dispatch twisting things again

    ReplyDelete
  6. well its true tho that Dakota's agency contact YG but no word after that lol

    ReplyDelete
  7. That's not a very good picture of her.

    ReplyDelete
  8. YG: "Reports are making it seem as if Dakota Fanning called [G-Dragon herself], but that’s different from the truth. It was communicated by the Korean agency."


    More like YG got trolled by Dakota's 'Korean' agency for press. Cause as far as the Real Time News no one really cared that she's coming until G-Dragon's name was brought up

    ReplyDelete
  9. That's not what her agency said, "Dakota Fanning never called G-Dragon, and they never promised to meet in Korea. There’s no truth to the rumors.” As well as, “Dakota’s side never called G-Dragon’s side. It is not true that they were in contact to meet up,” emphasizing that the reports were completely false.
    Read more: http://bigbangupdates.com/2013/01/dakota-fanning-to-meet-g-dragon-130105.html#ixzz2H89NY7Ap

    ReplyDelete
  10. Exactly. Just seems like some sensationalizing story to draw attention.

    ReplyDelete
  11. YG never claimed dakota herself "called up" YG, they said after the dispatch news came out that it was Dakota's korean promoter who contacted YG fro the meetup, NOT dakota herself nor yg had anything to do with it. no one was lying perse, just exaggerated info. dispatch probably was too excited

    ReplyDelete
  12. Except, her side denied ANY form of contact between them and YG so YG's claims are still false by Dakotas agencies word.

    ReplyDelete
  13. As far as the communication goes, 2 Agencies is running Dakota's press: 1 Korean-1 ACTUAL Agency. YG MAY have been called up by the Korean one (which they confirmed when other news reporters asked) without the ACTUAL agency knowing hence the "Dakota’s side never called G-Dragon’s side." response from what I am assuming from her ACTUAL agency.

    ReplyDelete
  14. YG got trolled -_-

    ReplyDelete
  15. YG just got trolled, it's really stupid if they lied like that.

    ReplyDelete
  16. No one really cared that she's coming until G-Dragon's name was brought up. More like YG got trolled by Dakota's 'Korean' agency for press.

    ReplyDelete
  17. VIPs thought GD was so amazing for meeting Dakota fanning until her agency denied any from of communication and desire to meet him.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Maybe the couple now is Dakota and Daesung.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I like Gd with black hair, lay off the hair dye bro.

    ReplyDelete
  20. some rumors are saying the next scandal is TOP and some actor...

    ReplyDelete
  21. So... yes Dakota fanning ever wanting to meet GD/being a fan/Contacting him is bullshit. That's all I was saying.

    ReplyDelete
  22. And Dispatch who is also one of the Anti YG press reported it first. Lol if YG wanted to "lie" to benefit from it right from the start OSEN would have been the one to bring out the Exclusive

    ReplyDelete
  23. i dont think GD is bothered either way he meets her or not.

    ReplyDelete
  24. actor or actress?

    ReplyDelete
  25. LOL. Okay.



    That still doesn't change the fact that VIPs were praising Dakota a few hours ago, saying how cool it was for GD to be contacted by a Hollywood celebrity, then once it comes out as false, VIPs throw the attention seeker role on her cause she's not that popular.

    ReplyDelete
  26. What are you trying to do??
    Grow up

    ReplyDelete
  27. No one said she's an "attention seeker", what's weird is her "Korean" agency or somewhere Dispatch needs and "found" the news ;)

    ReplyDelete
  28. I read actor but I think is actress.... I hope it's actress.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Lol. Grow up?


    I think its more immature to flaunt about something but once it turns out to not be in favor of oppa, deny it and make it less than what it was. If me thinking thats immature requires me to "grow up" then by all means I'll stay young, good day :)

    ReplyDelete
  30. yeah, lets both hope its actress.

    ReplyDelete
  31. What about.........
    You blame the Korean agency for using gd name ?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Her American side, not necessarily the Korean Agency- and they can easily lie and backtrack if her American agency kicked up a fuss which they probably did.
    Its possible someone initially contacted YG claiming to b eassociated with Drakota's agency so when asked YG would confirm it so their media playing would look more legitamite and if Drakota's side don't play along then YG's left with mud on their face and the agency/independent acting in the name of won't because no one knows who they are nor cares enough- Korean journalism and it seems agencies appear to not get held accountable as they tip off responsibilities to other parties. Not a korean myself but its a pattern I have been noticing on several issues. True or not, its sold news and got people to read their stuff- the main benefitter is the news group. Its likely both sides are telling the truth that they know but they've been messed about as there's been falsehood going on the middle.
    While YG does associate with American professions and a lot of their associations come to naught I think in this case GD's name might be being used to highlight Drakota's presence in Korea as it would gain YG little in terms of American press- what American Celebrities get up to in Asia is rarely reported unless its sensational. They could have used Taeyang or TOP who are relatively more public friendly plus Taeyang is rumoured to be having a comeback soon and TOP being the usual pick for pretty actresses but GD grabs more people's attention for good and bad with the general public, besides she might have made some remark that she at least heard of GD which might have initated the actions which have blown things out of proportion- note they never denied that that she was a fan only that they didn't make contact.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Yes because poor GD got such a bad response from this, from what I read they think GD is great to be in contact with a Hollywood actor, they really diminished his name.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Why she/he cares? A little blame VIPs/GD is all she/he needs ;)

    ReplyDelete
  35. I don't know what to say no more

    ReplyDelete
  36. No ones blaming GD here for anything, so try harder ;)

    ReplyDelete
  37. No I don't want try anything for you, nice day netizen ;)

    ReplyDelete
  38. Lol, nice day to you netizen. :)

    ReplyDelete
  39. Ikr, it's pointless ( ´ ▽ ` )

    ReplyDelete
  40. No one is saying that she's an attention seeker. Its her "Korean Company" who is...cause they needed press for her activities in Korea.


    This is how the media works. Both in Hollywood,Korea and pretty much everywhere else in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Maybe not lie, but YG would definitely exaggerate to strengthen GD's image...

    ReplyDelete
  42. If no one was saying she's an attention seeker, I wouldn't have brought it up, but now that VIPs have brought up the fact that nobody cared she was in Korea until GD's name was brought up (which is another way to say she is an attention seeker, looking for good press and using others to do so = attention seeking) I've seen a large amount of VIPs take to their little twitters and Tumblr saying she did this to receive more attention.

    Attention seeker.

    ReplyDelete
  43. If you have nothing to say, it is.

    ReplyDelete
  44. What a terrible picture choice.

    ReplyDelete
  45. WaitingToBeThumbedDownJanuary 5, 2013 at 3:03 PM

    Don't bother, this is YG war zone. You'll never get anywhere, if there's any fandom that can't take criticism its YG stans.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Like I said..........................."HER KOREAN COMPANY" did. Well it is true though? I watch the real time charts myself...and none of her activities were highlighted until GD's name was brought up.


    Is Dakota herself to blame for that? Absolutely not.


    My original comment pertains to the people claiming that YG was the one who started all this when it is completely not true.

    ReplyDelete
  47. love love love your uname/id

    ReplyDelete
  48. You call that criticism?
    Keeeeeekeeeeee
    It's YGantis zone here, open your eyes

    ReplyDelete
  49. And my comment pertains to the fact that there are a lot of VIPs who have done a complete 180 on Dakota from her being great to her being an attention seeker. I don't care about YG getting trolled or whatever, I'm saying the response from VIPs is immature in making her seem like such an attention seeker.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Well the media (Dispatch) exaggerated by saying Dakota herself called up GD, when even YG denied that? So really, would YG be thrilled if according to the "Korean Agency" who called up YG Dakota was interested? Definitely.


    But if YG really wanted to full one "exaggerate to strengthen GD's image" they would have gotten Osen to do an exclusive about it. Not Dispatch who is known to be against YG's side.

    ReplyDelete
  51. lol... because it would be so bad for him to be gay?

    ReplyDelete
  52. So in the end...you shouldn't be replying to me cause we're talking about 2 different things lmao.

    ReplyDelete
  53. WaitingToBeThumbedDownJanuary 5, 2013 at 3:19 PM

    Um, yes? Calling someone out for immaturity is criticism. Keke (shortening it its too long) is definitely not spreading hate. They didn't use any vulgar terms to describe VIPs, they didn't spew anything hateful about the fandom, they commented on the immature nature of the response of some VIP's. You guys tend to think any negative response is "hating" when I don't see any hateful malicious nature in kekes comments, just frustration.

    This is why I think you guys can't take criticism.
    And please, this is place is swarming with YG stans, there's no way in hell it could be an anti-yg zone, YG stans here just get so upset by a few comments that they turn it into a fiasco.

    ReplyDelete
  54. No because your comment contained a prime example.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Daesung is as ugly as dakota without make up.

    ReplyDelete
  56. actually TOP had homosexual rumors before. I believe he's a virgin and shy boy.

    ReplyDelete
  57. korean VIPs know Gdragon is bisexual and they love it.

    ReplyDelete
  58. korean reportes wanted GD to look good near Dakota.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Well...I wouldn't call it hate, unless you're sensitive like that.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Prime example of what? you claim that VIPs have done 180 on Dakota...Well I'm not a fan of Dakota to begin with so there is no 180 to go to or from. I never claimed she HERSELF is an attention seeker, her "korean company" is or better yet, DISPATCH is because if you look at the comments made by the netizens up there they are calling out Dispatch fails and I pointed out that, Dispatch does have a track record of going against YG.

    ReplyDelete
  61. " I believe he's a virgin and shy boy." LMAO BS.
    He's shy..yes. He's a virgin? definitely not.

    ReplyDelete
  62. you think TOP is not a virgin?! WTH

    ReplyDelete
  63. Essentially your comment says "Nobody cared about her until GD's name was brought up," I don't care if you're a fan, I don't care about Dispatch and whatever anti-yg sentiment you think they have, I really don't. I commented on the fact that it was amazing when the news was in his favor, but now that things flipped, the reoccurring theme is Dakotas attention seeking efforts. Your comment was merely triggering.

    ReplyDelete
  64. VIPs love it but koreans will hate him for gay and drug addict.

    ReplyDelete
  65. YG you are giving me so much second hand embarrasement lol

    ReplyDelete
  66. Gurlll have you listened better yet read any translations from his songs? the descriptions alone is too precise for it not to have some sense of truth.

    ReplyDelete
  67. What do you want me to say? That IS what happened. No one cared then GD's name was suddenly added by Dispatch and it garnered attention. And I don't merely "think" dispatch have anti yg sentiment its known and they along with some producers in KBS have been called out by both netizens and the industry higher ups for it.


    There is no point on going any longer, we will agree to disagree lol

    ReplyDelete
  68. Or he can watch a lot of porn... you dont have to have sex to know the motions these days

    ReplyDelete
  69. I read a VIP on Tumblr saying GD turned down Dakota fanning and she got butthurt so that's why they released a statement saying she never made any contact.


    The delusions of that fandom I swear, Esp when YG said GD was willing to shift his schedule around to meet her. lol Yeah GD def turned her down

    ReplyDelete
  70. Top had rumors with shin mina before.

    ReplyDelete
  71. his lyrics are hot but that doesn't mean he's not a virgin. And like the other person said, he could be watching a lot of porn.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Right but did you get the part about there being two agencies and a gossip magazine involved? Clearly, GD's name gets a lot of press IN KOREA. Somebody used his name to stir up some interest in an American actress while she was IN KOREA where she is probably less known. Sounds like YG was trolled by someone, but honestly we'll never know who.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Sure...but with his number of older woman girlfriends and accounts of partying and how he interacts with them, to say that he is "virgin" is unlikely.

    ReplyDelete
  74. I think she really is a fan.. he has many international fangirls like the british Peaches Geldof she wants to meet gd when she goes to korea. She said this herself on nylon magazine.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Do you go to bigbang fan sites? You seem pretty keen.

    ReplyDelete
  76. I only know one big bang fansite and thats where I saw the woute from dakotas agency, but I really don't ser how that matters?

    ReplyDelete
  77. And I also got the part about dakota not contacting GD. Any more redundant infor you want to share?

    ReplyDelete
  78. some fangirls man...

    ReplyDelete
  79. LMAO
    TOP is gay, more gay than Yunho.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Typical YG haters. Smh.

    U guys have nothing else better in real life to do?
    Instead if butting in YG related articles all the time. Damn your dedication. Haha.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Well you are clearly being thick headed. Did I ever say that she did? So what's your point? My point was simply that the party spreading the false info appears to be neither Dakota or YG but some third party. Clear enough for you or are you going to come back with something else completely snarky and beside the point?

    ReplyDelete
  82. No, I clearly don't understand why you are repeating information that was already given in at least five other comments. Clear enough for you? Or are you going to come back with more redundant ass information to make yourself feel more accomplished.

    ReplyDelete
  83. how the fuck is T.O.P. gay? Yunho, Key and Siwon are gay, not T.O.P.

    ReplyDelete
  84. thats human nature. why bother pointing out something negative when there are another positive things we do? it just that ppl want to pick on vip not so nice reaction. how about care your own business, while we stay harmless to you.

    and regarding your name waitingtobethumbeddown, i see you care so much about these voting things, you can see now that you didnt get thumb down a lot enough right?? its ygantis zone here. and fyi every kpop fandom is the same

    ReplyDelete
  85. ikr?? Top is a known man slut.

    ReplyDelete
  86. I saw Dakota without makeup and she's not ugly at all, Daesung is a lost case.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Oh yes he did. :)

    http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/9246/stphoto01209696425zq8.jpg

    http://dongbangedcloud.wordpress.com/2008/05/04/big-bangs-top-and-shin-min-ah-caught-on-tape5-2-08/

    Back in 2008 though. No one remembers it, but it caused quite a stir at the time... This was during the "Lies" era so Big Bang's popularity skyrockets and the VIPs went apeshit over it. Lol.

    ReplyDelete
  88. gay male VIPs love when he's blonde

    ReplyDelete
  89. no, its called butthurt troll, the way i see it, :)

    ReplyDelete
  90. lmfao you must be very naive to think that a 25 years old hot rich and famous man is still a virgin wake up girl

    ReplyDelete
  91. WaitingToBeThumbedDownJanuary 5, 2013 at 9:10 PM

    Uh - so you're saying since it's human nature it's okay for you to be immature? Seriously? I think the reaction had to affect/irritate/annoy that person if they made a comment about it. Or do you not realize that a lot of VIPs have the ability to do that?

    In regards to my name, I don't care at all about the votes, its obvious satire, if you don't know what that means then look it up. I can go on any other YG and see someone commenting negatively towards a YG artists saying they don't like this or that and I assure you the thumbs down are amazing. Its definitely not an Anti YG zone, you guys just take one thing and blow it up creating even more drama than necessary and seeing as how it's quite easy for you to get upset, of course you're going to see it as a Anti-YG zone. This is coming from a third party who has no company to stan, YG stans surround this place, then SM, and I don't even know if JYP stans know or care about this place.

    Ugh. The all kpop fandoms are the same is getting a bit redundant don't you think? I agree but then again I see more YG stans acting like they are different from other kpop fandoms than any other fandoms so I don't see how that is an excuse. But OKAY.

    ReplyDelete
  92. But you're the one who seems butthurt over their comment.

    ReplyDelete
  93. nope not at all. but homosexuality is a taboo in korea. and he wont be the only one that suffers. at the end of the day bb is a product you have to think of what damage a scandal like that would cause for YG and its stock value.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Dispatch is know for it but YG is also known for their media play.

    ReplyDelete
  95. ask any Top fan and they would say he is at least bisexual.

    ReplyDelete
  96. that "scandal" was created by YG to make TOP more popular and closer to actors.

    ReplyDelete
  97. He's not fucking left and right like Seungri or Gdragon

    ReplyDelete
  98. wow wow girl, dakota is not THAT ugly, calm down.

    ReplyDelete
  99. No I already gave up putting my thought into others'
    Gotta go

    ReplyDelete
  100. The only one being redundant here is you. If this is information you were already aware of then your initial comment was completely unnecessary. Right? Because you sounded like you were having trouble understanding and you still do.

    ReplyDelete
  101. All I can say is if this place full of yg stan, ur comment will be down in any minutes, and it won't be only me who bother to argue with you
    Have a good night

    ReplyDelete
  102. WaitingToBeThumbedDownJanuary 5, 2013 at 11:46 PM

    There would be no reason to argue with me unless the rest of the fandom gets asshurt over me saying there's a lot of YG stans on this site and the person you replied to was actually criticizing the fandoms behavior.

    But it seems you have nothing more or rather no way to answer the point I was making so you're just going to back out, so that's fine as well.



    The power in my name is... since I'm already expecting it, YG stans are going to lay off to prove a point - aka that there's not a lot of you here, but I can see it just from the comments in this article and the downvotes they received. Who knows not that I've said something I might get tons of them :)

    ReplyDelete
  103. My first comment was already answered to - repeatedly - with the same shit you just said, so by definition you are being redundant and really a pest right now. It seems like you are having trouble getting logic through your head so I'll break it down for you

    My first comment was replied to, multiple times AFTER I posted the comment you replied to, which you come to tell me the same shit they already told me. If you have a brain, please use it to read what the others have said and you'll realize your redundancy.

    Was that clear enough for you or do I have to break it down into simpler terms.

    Many people already beat you to the punch, you are repeating the same shit they said.

    Got it? Or should I go lower so you can comprehend me, kindergarden level maybe?

    ReplyDelete
  104. Lolwut, get a real account first, hun
    I'm totally fine with whatever your opinion against us, none of those are fact anyway
    I've got some homework to do, bye
    Ps: I'm not a yg Stan.......just a VIP---> BIG BANG fans

    ReplyDelete
  105. WaitingToBeThumbedDownJanuary 6, 2013 at 12:12 AM

    Fact: There are a lot of YG stans who use this site.

    I don't think that's an opinion... And why are you saying "against us" like you're being attacked? I honestly hope you don't think this is being attacked because that proves my criticism point to the tee. I think you're flustered, or just have no idea what to say because your reply is making you seem really dense. Like really dense. But my life doesn't revolve around Kpop and visiting a site like this all the time, it's merely a weekend indulgence when I have nothing to do, so getting a real "account" would be useless considering I would rarely ever use it.

    I know who VIPs are. You were getting upset and Keke for calling them out on their immature antics which you excused as okay because it's human nature, which I don't see how that is a reason for immaturity to ever be acceptable.

    I can see your responses are becoming more and more off topic, and more centered around you getting out of here because as I said, you have nothing to say so I'll let you go.

    ReplyDelete
  106. WaitingToBeThumbedDownJanuary 6, 2013 at 12:20 AM

    You're really doing to much here. You came a little late with your response which is the same thing being said up there, so you are the only one being redundant in this situation because this comment was one of the first comments on this page before everybody else started commenting... I think you are the one that's confused.

    ReplyDelete
  107. A fact (derived from the Latin factum) is something that has really occurred or is actually the case. The usual test for a statement of fact is verifiability, that is whether it can be proven to correspond to experience. Standard reference works are often used to check facts. Scientific facts are verified by repeatable experiments.

    It's okay if you said your opinion is a fact, it's an opinion anyway keke
    Idk what history you had with yg Stan, you better work it
    If you have a real life, you should spend your time more in suicide,child abuse,etc
    Now excuse me, i need to get my homework done
    And I will so much appreciate it, if u don't reply to this comment sir

    ReplyDelete
  108. You really shouldn't get so angry. It's just the internet. Since you're acting like a preschooler i had to assume you didn't understand.

    ReplyDelete
  109. WaitingToBeThumbedDownJanuary 6, 2013 at 12:46 AM

    And there is evidence to prove the presence of YG stans on this site.

    Denial:Noun
    The action of declaring something to be untrue: "she shook her head in denial".
    The refusal of something requested or desired.


    I believe you are suffering from this. But I can only assume you are going to deny that as well considering you are suffering from compulsive denial. As I said, your responses are drifting from any and everything I am talking about, it seems you have NOTHING to say that pertains to what I am saying. It's really making you look dense once again. How do you know I don't do those things? How do you know I don't work with people who are depressed and have suicidal thoughts? You don't. You don't know anything about me. As this is my weekend, I am free to do as I please and considering today was a slow day, I roamed the kpop world for a while.


    Now, if your homework was truly important you wouldn't be replying to me. And it is impolite to refer to someone as sir or miss without knowledge of their gender.


    Please, in effort to stop embarrassing yourself with low-grade dense responses don't bother, they make no sense and don't coincide with my statements at all. I wonder if you can even understand anything I have said or you are blatantly being thick headed about it, I hope its the latter. I'm sorry, but your request has obviously been denied dear. But I believe I can live without your appreciation.

    ReplyDelete
  110. lol no way he's a virgin

    ReplyDelete
  111. Maybe so, but it's difficult to follow conversations on this site. That poster could simply have ignored my comment, but instead chose to answer and the conversation devolved from there.

    ReplyDelete
  112. Dear pot, please meet kettle.

    Assumptions make an ass out of you, next time, use your brain and logic, you can avoid meeting angry preschoolers on the internet.

    ReplyDelete
  113. He really has no rumours around him supporting that. It is possible though. But all his dating/sex rumours seem to be with female celebrities.

    ReplyDelete
  114. So what? People can't change their minds?

    ReplyDelete
  115. That would make no sense bc he received a lot of backlash for that. lol

    ReplyDelete
  116. l o l have you met TOP fans? Because they really wouldn't. (GTOP does not count btw; that's just a whole other topic on its own).

    ReplyDelete
  117. True. Sorry, I just get really pissed when I see fangirls hoping their oppa is not gay for other reasons.

    ReplyDelete
  118. TOP and Se7en experimented probably, there are rumors about Se7en and Park Han Byul's relationship.

    ReplyDelete
  119. This site is loosing its TOUCH now....

    ReplyDelete
  120. Ignore that person. We can all see through him/her. It's normal for a fan like you to be passionate about this but when a non fan goes this far it's not normal. They should go concentrate on their own bias.

    ReplyDelete